Re: OpenSSL 0.9.6/0.9.7, LDAP, SSH, friends

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: OpenSSL 0.9.6/0.9.7, LDAP, SSH, friends
From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 13:41:32 +0900
Message-id: <[🔎] 87k7g66rgj.wl@atoron.work.isl.doshisha.ac.jp.doshisha.ac.jp>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20030212033044.GB1479@vitelus.com>
References: <20030212030755.GL18261@ns.snowman.net> <[🔎] 20030212033044.GB1479@vitelus.com>

> <whine>Why does the name of the libssl package change EVERY FRIGGING
> release? Does upstream really change the soname? Do they really break
> binary compatibility? WHY?</whine>

If you are experiencing problems (like segfault) with linking 0.9.6 and 0.9.7
at the same time, it is most likely that you will experience
similar problems even if the soname didn't change...


regards,
	junichi

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: OpenSSL 0.9.6/0.9.7, LDAP, SSH, friends
  - From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>

References:
- Re: OpenSSL 0.9.6/0.9.7, LDAP, SSH, friends
  - From: Aaron Lehmann <aaronl@vitelus.com>

Prev by Date: Re: OpenSSL 0.9.6/0.9.7, LDAP, SSH, friends
Next by Date: Re: OpenSSL 0.9.6/0.9.7, LDAP, SSH, friends
Previous by thread: Re: OpenSSL 0.9.6/0.9.7, LDAP, SSH, friends
Next by thread: Re: OpenSSL 0.9.6/0.9.7, LDAP, SSH, friends
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread