Re: testing, unstable, and dependencies
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 07:06:06PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
The answer was no, because this would mean that libraries in unstable
would never get tested before they are moved into testing.
Which is, as always, a silly argument because it discounts local
compiles and testing against unstable. It also discounts the case of
build dependencies forcing the use of the newer libraries.
Mike Stone
Reply to:
- References:
- testing, unstable, and dependencies
- From: Jason Kraftcheck <kraftche@cae.wisc.edu>
- Re: testing, unstable, and dependencies
- From: Brian May <bam@debian.org>
- Re: testing, unstable, and dependencies
- From: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org>
- Re: testing, unstable, and dependencies
- From: Ola Lundqvist <opal@debian.org>
- Re: testing, unstable, and dependencies
- From: Brian May <bam@debian.org>