Re: Please don't non-bugs in changelog (again)
On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 09:16:42PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Mon, 03 Feb 2003, Brian May wrote:
> > I thought the idea was that bugs for stable should have the
> > "woody" tag added, and not be closed.
> Depends on the maintainer. It is a good idea to tag them, and leave them
> open IMHO.
Then why is everyone using (closes: #nnnn) in changelog? Many bugs, especially
upstream bugs, are fixed with new releases but most of the time people
just close them as new packages get into sid.