Re: Please don't non-bugs in changelog (again)
On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 05:28:11PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 05:01:14PM -0600, Adam Majer wrote:
> > I do not believe that we will get KDE 3 into sarge if the maintainer
> > of Qt is not willing to check that all of the examples provided
> > with Qt both compile and run out-of-the-box before the new Qt packages are
> > allowed to enter Sid. Is that too much to ask?
> I'm sure if the examples are really valid tests of the library's
> seaworthiness, the maintainer will be happy to accept patches to include
> such checks in the build rules.
They are not a test of the library. They are a test of the package.
Thus, examples should _not_ be built as part of the build rules. They should be
built _after_ one installs the new packages...