Josselin Mouette wrote: > > Next time you'll be telling us that runtime cpudetection is worse than > > distributing many binaries. > That's what you have been telling everyone for years. Now you do runtime > detection, will you forget that ? We are talking about distribution, not speed, aren't we. Thanks for listening closely. > Now you haven't got further. The legality of mplayer is still > questionable, while that of many other players is not. Be my guest: I'm about to start a new thread, concering xine's legality. It seems you don't know anything about it.. Just do dpkg -L :) > Most distributions will just stick to the legal ones, Which are non-existant, as you'll see > which are the ones gaining users and thus developers. See e.g. the progress > of xine and its interfaces for the latest months. Yes, it gained developers from MPlayer. (!) > > In my very first mail I wrote _just this_, thanks for reading it... > > I'm here for Marillat. > Marillat's address is marillat@debian.org, not debian-devel@lists.debian.org. Well Marillat's address becomes debian-devel@ at the same moment he publicly says we lie. -- Gabucino MPlayer Core Team "not sure how we will proceed here - xine's potential in the video processing field is imho so great that i certainly don't want to miss the chance to work into that direction." - Guenter, xine developer
Attachment:
pgpGol0_gCEuS.pgp
Description: PGP signature