On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 03:02:44PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le dim 26/01/2003 à 08:36, Gabucino a écrit : > > Okay it seems we must talk about this old topic again - be it. > > You must see that this was the ONLY way to > > - staying legal (that bunch of sources was legal because each "libs" were > > distinctable, but _what license would you have given to the binary?_) > This is not legal, at least when there the software includes some GPL > code. Please provide a reference to the section of the GPL that would make this illegal. To the best of my knowledge, and from this brief description of what they're doing, this IS legal as long as they don't distribute binaries. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
pgpnwujZTdEcY.pgp
Description: PGP signature