Re: Proposal: Debian release numbers
> >Note that of that list, only GNOME 2 itself warranted a major number change.
> >All the others were considered by their upstream developers to be minor
> The move from kde 2.2 to 3.1 is minor? And the move from g++ 2.95 to g++
I would at least bump the major number for sarge, just
for g++ 3.2 migration.
I don't think Debian should follow Apple's example, of
putting in gcc migration for Jaguar release so subtly ;P