[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposal: Debian release numbers

On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 09:34:11PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
> (I'm undecided about woody. Did the introduction of the testing
> distribution count as a large restructuring?  It didn't affect the release
> itself much, but it's a significant change in the way we do releases.)

There are other things, see the -private archive (or was this on -devel? I
don't recall).

I for one used to object the 2.2->3.0 version bump and thought that raw
package number increase and crypto in main were the only things that came
close to justifying it. But as time goes by, I'm starting to realize just
how much potato is behind woody actually, so I'm more and more happy with

     2. That which causes joy or happiness.

Reply to: