Re: Proposal: Debian release numbers
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 15:32, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 09:20:54AM +0000, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > Does the gcc 3.2 transition constitute a major enough change? How about
> > the inclusion of d-i? KDE 3.1? GNOME 2? Linux 2.4?
> Since Linux 2.4 was included in woody (despite claims by the popular press
> to the contrary), I'd say that is definitely not a major change.
With gcc 3.2, KDE 3.1, GNOME 2, Linux 2.4 kernel(by default), and
XFree86 4.3(maybe?) we can't disagree that sarge is a major upgrade,
calling 4 or 4.0.Or not?
Gustavo Franco <firstname.lastname@example.org>