Re: gcc 3.2 epoch?

[Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>]

> - Debian package version, based entirely on the Debian revision, and
>   not based on the upstream version (although the maintainer
>   could decide to base the version on the upstream version
>   if desired).
> 
> - upstream package version, stored as an attribute within the
>   package, and also used for referencing upstream source.

We could even move over at this time.

Just add an "Advertized Upstream Version" section to the 
control file, to satisfy the people who think epochs are so bad.


regards,
	junichi