Re: gcc 3.2 epoch?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Just add an "Advertized Upstream Version" section to the control file,
> to satisfy the people who think epochs are so bad.
That would also increase the number of security related questions like:
release 1.2.3 is reported to be vulnerable, why is Debian still shipping
1.2.3 and not 1.2.4?
The debian sub-version should not be hidden, the epoch is already almost
Also I don't think it's a terribly good idea to have two completely
separated versioning schemes side by side in two different files (control
- -- arthur - firstname.lastname@example.org - http://tiefighter.et.tudelft.nl/~arthur --
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----