On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 12:19, Gustavo Franco wrote: > On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 15:32, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 09:20:54AM +0000, Scott James Remnant wrote: > > > > > Does the gcc 3.2 transition constitute a major enough change? How about > > > the inclusion of d-i? KDE 3.1? GNOME 2? Linux 2.4? > > > > Since Linux 2.4 was included in woody (despite claims by the popular press > > to the contrary), I'd say that is definitely not a major change. > > With gcc 3.2, KDE 3.1, GNOME 2, Linux 2.4 kernel(by default), and > XFree86 4.3(maybe?) we can't disagree that sarge is a major upgrade, > calling 4 or 4.0.Or not? The big change from Deb 2.x to 3.0 was the introduction of the testing distribution. I fail to see a similarly big change for 3.1 (sarge) cheers -- vbi -- this email is protected by a digital signature: http://fortytwo.ch/gpg
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part