On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 09:04, Richard Kettlewell wrote: > Ryan Murray <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes: > > o Add a Conflict with the non-`c102' version of the > > package. > > If I am reading this right you are planning to break backwards > compatibility, and prevent any locally compiled programs linked > against pre-3.2 libraries from working after the new packages are > installed. > No, g++ 3.2 has broken backwards compatibility, all the transition is trying to do is deal with that. Scott -- Scott James Remnant Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange http://netsplit.com/ things happen? Are you going round the twist?
Description: This is a digitally signed message part