[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: gcc 3.2 transition in unstable

On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 09:04, Richard Kettlewell wrote:

> Ryan Murray <rmurray@debian.org> writes:
> >                o Add a Conflict with the non-`c102' version of the
> >                  package.
> If I am reading this right you are planning to break backwards
> compatibility, and prevent any locally compiled programs linked
> against pre-3.2 libraries from working after the new packages are
> installed.
No, g++ 3.2 has broken backwards compatibility, all the transition is
trying to do is deal with that.

Scott James Remnant     Have you ever, ever felt like this?  Had strange
http://netsplit.com/      things happen?  Are you going round the twist?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: