[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: gcc 3.2 transition in unstable

Ryan Murray <rmurray@debian.org> writes:
>                o Add a Conflict with the non-`c102' version of the
>                  package.

If I am reading this right you are planning to break backwards
compatibility, and prevent any locally compiled programs linked
against pre-3.2 libraries from working after the new packages are

(Unless I've misunderstood), perhaps this should be more heavily
emphasized (or, ideally, fixed)?


Reply to: