Re: Removing openuniverse in favor of celestia (keep a virtualpackage?)

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Removing openuniverse in favor of celestia (keep a virtualpackage?)
From: Michael Banck <mbanck@gmx.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 23:55:18 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20021228225517.GB1003@blackbird.oase.mhn.de>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.44.0212282111440.1644-100000@petertosh>
References: <[🔎] 20021228152035.GA617@speedy.private> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.44.0212282111440.1644-100000@petertosh>

On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 09:19:48PM +0100, tomas pospisek wrote:
> permit yourself some leasure time and have a look. It leaves you in
> awe in face of the dimensions of our universe.

I had that experience when I first played Elite2:Frontier...

MIchael

-- 
"Meines Wissens liegt die Kultur irgendwo auf einem Pariser Friedhof,
direkt neben Jim Morrison."
                -- Dr. Joachim Neudert

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Removing openuniverse in favor of celestia (keep a virtual package?)
  - From: Steve Greenland <steveg@moregruel.net>
- Re: Removing openuniverse in favor of celestia (keep a virtual package?)
  - From: tomas pospisek <tpo2@sourcepole.ch>

Prev by Date: Re: Common security checks for a base installation - packages reviewed.
Next by Date: Re: Bug#174525: ITP: dar -- Disk ARchive: Backup directory tree and files.
Previous by thread: Re: Removing openuniverse in favor of celestia (keep a virtual package?)
Next by thread: Re: Removing openuniverse in favor of celestia (keep a virtual package?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread