Re: More spam than developer mail
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> In chiark.mail.debian.devel, you wrote:
> >Ola Lundqvist:
> >> I think this is ok for a public list.
> >
> >Spam is *never* ok.
> >
> >Remember: Spam should not be propagated beyond necessity.
>
> Significantly reducing functionality in order to prevent spam
> propagation means that the Terrorists Have Won.
razor2 does not reduce functionality, it only reduces the level of spam.
I have yet to hear a good excuse not to use razor2.
This has nothing to do with "significantly reducing functionality".
There is absolutely no need to distribute spam which are known to be spam.
Reply to: