Re: More spam than developer mail

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: More spam than developer mail
From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 23:42:53 +0100 (CET)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.51.0212202335370.5448@home.unex.es>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20021220104024.GB18010@chrystal.opal.dhs.org>
References: <[🔎] 20021219105902.7c02a535.pa3aba@debian.org> <[🔎] 20021220104024.GB18010@chrystal.opal.dhs.org>

Ola Lundqvist:
> I think this is ok for a public list.

Spam is *never* ok.

Remember: Spam should not be propagated beyond necessity.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: More spam than developer mail
  - From: Matthew Garrett <mgarrett@chiark.greenend.org.uk>

References:
- More spam than developer mail
  - From: Joop Stakenborg <pa3aba@debian.org>
- Re: More spam than developer mail
  - From: Ola Lundqvist <opal@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Bug#173803: ITP: WvPrint -- Printing System for Linux that makes installing printers truly plug and play
Next by Date: Re: Why is ulogd not built not m68k and ia64?
Previous by thread: Re: More spam than developer mail
Next by thread: Re: More spam than developer mail
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread