Re: [PATCH] - fix for local root exploit in exim 3.35.

To: Debian Developers <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] - fix for local root exploit in exim 3.35.
From: Ulrich Eckhardt <uli@doommachine.dyndns.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 01:05:15 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] E18PAfD-0002et-00@monolith>
Reply-to: doomster@knuut.de
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20021219223816.GA28210@sauron.shadowglade.net>
References: <87bs3kvoqv.fsf@nocrew.org> <[🔎] 1040335166.2053.5.camel@nethack.netsplit.com> <[🔎] 20021219223816.GA28210@sauron.shadowglade.net>

On Thursday 19 December 2002 23:38, Matthew McGuire wrote:
> Case in point,
> an MS patent regarding Palladium like software architecture are broad
> enough in definition to threaten projects like the HURD. Ironically, I
> believe the HURD could be used as an example of prior art in this case
> as well.

Could you elaborate a bit what you meant with that ? Just curious ...

thanks
Uli

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] - fix for local root exploit in exim 3.35.
  - From: Matthew McGuire <gray@shadowglade.net>

References:
- Re: [PATCH] - fix for local root exploit in exim 3.35.
  - From: Scott James Remnant <scott@netsplit.com>
- Re: [PATCH] - fix for local root exploit in exim 3.35.
  - From: Matthew McGuire <gray@shadowglade.net>

Prev by Date: Does policy section 12.6 apply to inbox monitors?
Next by Date: Re: 3.2 transition
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] - fix for local root exploit in exim 3.35.
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] - fix for local root exploit in exim 3.35.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread