[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: 3.2 transition

Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp> writes:

> I've thought having a directory for doing LD_LIBRARY_PATH might help
> people keep compatibility with other dists or legacy applications,
> thoughts?

I think that should happen on a case-by-case basis, with a bias
towards not providing the library. The only major exception would
be libstdc++ itself, which doesn't even need to live in an extra


Reply to: