Re: And why DDTP does not use webwml? Re: Why DDTP? shouldn't it be DPTP? (was Re: spanish translations in DDTP now)
----- Original Message -----
From: Michael Bramer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 19:34:06 +0100
To: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
Subject: Re: And why DDTP does not use webwml? Re: Why DDTP? shouldn't it be DPTP? (was Re: spanish translations in DDTP now)
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 01:23:33PM +0100, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
> > One question I have is why DDTP does not use webwml. This is now part
> > of the Debian project (as it's under ddtp.debian.org), but it's
> > completely incoherent with Debian www style, and it also is the part
> > of the Debian web with less translations!
Well, as DDTP's site developer, I must admin I didn't take into
consideration webwml when I started designing the site, just because I
think DDTP's site has its own requirements. I liked WML concept, though.
I don't think that being part of a Debian sub-project implies using
webwml (see some projects at http://www.debian.org/devel/ like
Debian-Edu). Nevertheless, I agree that what Debain users perceive is
not something homogeneous.
Is there any point regarding translator work, anyway?
PS: please, include me in you reply because I'm not subscribed to
Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com
One click access to the Top Search Engines