Re: Why are new package versions depending on libc6 in unstable?
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 05:41:42PM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 09:26:58PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> >We want the development-package of the libraries to be tested, *before*
> >they move to testing.
> You're once again discouting the possibility of people running unstable
> and doing local compiles.
For local testing purposes of course, right? Then they would either submit
it to a buildd or compile against/depend on testing when submitting it to
debian, right? Or do I have that wrong?