Jochen Voss wrote: > > Josip Rodin wrote: > > > Why is it "lame-brained"?! Users have repeatedly complained about how they > > > want URLs on packages web pages. Putting them in the Description: fields > > > sounds just fine to me. > > > > Simply because the description field is not the right place (see other > > mails), and because this conflicts with established practice and policy, ... > > How does it conflict with policy? Again, that was not the best choice of words, read "redundant" or something. > E.g. the fdutils package has an URL in the > package description for a very long time. > Should this be changed in you opinion? In my opinion that particular URL is not very helpful in describing what the package does (the rest of the description does a reasonable job, though it might be good if it included the command list from the web page), and so it should be removed from the package's description. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
pgpWPINDtALgG.pgp
Description: PGP signature