John Goerzen wrote: > > I agree, we don't have to distribute all software ourselves, but it > > certainly makes things more convenience for our users and > > developers. > I for one would find it more convenient if Debian could arrange to send me a > nice check each month :-) The difference is the first is already occurring on infrastructure that has been developed over time. There is not any significant savings in cost by eliminating the first. > > I share your belief about free software and Debian's greatness. I also > > think that having non-free supported by Debian's mirrors and > > infrastrructure contributes to Debian's value. > I'm not sure I agree there. I for one hope that people are not choosing > Debian based on the non-free software on our FTP site. In fact, I dare say > that I would not be sorry to see us lose such users. There are so many > other reasons to be choosing Debian. I agree that there are a lot of other reasons to choose Debian. That's why, even if non-free were to be taken out of Debian's mirrors, I would still use develop Debian but my time would be split developing an alternate infrastructure to support non-free. -- Kevin Rosenberg | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** http://b9.com/debian.html | : :' : The universal GPG signed and encrypted | `. `' Operating System messages accepted. | `- http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
pgpeYljeXHnXi.pgp
Description: PGP signature