Re: Discussion - non-free software removal
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 03:51:55PM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 09:14:46AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> > Seriously, it is toned down. Yes. It's because I think that a more firm GR
> > would not find enough support to pass.
> GRs are multiple-choice-sorted-by-preference, they aren't
> pass-or-fail. I would put all available options into the vote.
I would be happy to do that. My understanding is that this requires a bit
of procedural manipulation; that is, people other than myself propose
amendments which I duly reject. I would be happy to formally object to
amendments that I'd like to see, for the sake of choice :-)
You're certainly welcome to offer something up.