Re: Migration of non-free packages to testing
>>"Dirk" == Dirk Eddelbuettel <email@example.com> writes:
Dirk> On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 04:26:52PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
>> Just remember: it's not Debian.
Dirk> "I didn't have sex with this woman."
Dirk> -- William J. Clinton, late 1990s
Dirk> You're splitting the same hairs, dude.
Dirk> The fact that Debian maintainers volunteer to look after
Dirk> non-free software because it is of use to them, and/or to their
Dirk> users, makes it an effective part of Debian. The rest is
Dirk> academic, semantics, or whatever you like to call it. Last
Dirk> post in this thread for me.
Thank you for this compelling argument.
I am convinced, and I shall no longer oppose the GR amending
the social contract advocating the removal of the non-free packages
If it were not so much of a hassle rebooting my laptop to sign
this message, I would have made this a formal retraction copied to
-vote as well.
Promptness is its own reward, if one lives by the clock instead of
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C