On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 11:56:12PM -0400, Luke Seubert scribbled: > On 10/23/2002 11:34 PM, Daniel Burrows at dnb114@psu.edu wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 10:33:08PM -0400, Luke Seubert > > <ls.maillist@verizon.net> was heard to say: > >> What you are suggesting in general, QT Apps in the menu when running KDE and > >> GTK apps in the menu when running GTK compatible GUIs has great merit. It > >> seems that a consensus is emerging to do just that. > > > > What do you do the rest of the time? (say, when running XFce or a > > "bare" window manager) > > > Good question. For something like XFce, which if I recall correctly, has > good bindings to GTK apps, I would say go with a GTK based menu, i.e. the > default menu used with Gnome. The question is whether Debian Desktop will exist for bare window managers and XFCe, too? Or do we consider only KDE/GNOME as the DD target environments? > For the really neutral "bare" window managers that have no QT or GTK > preference, well, I guess we would need a few flamewars to hash that one out > ;-) A newbie will not use a bare WindowMaker... If they do, they're not newbies anymore, IMHO. Otherwise we might be forced to somehow add support for twm :-) marek
Attachment:
pgp74wJCe7a1t.pgp
Description: PGP signature