On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 12:46:55AM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote: > What I propose is a sort of moderation by self-appointed committee. > Software would pass any obvious non-spam along (signed by debian > developer or low spamassassin score) then hold anything else for > review. Reviewers would log in to a web page, and messages would be > displayed with choices of spam, non-spam, inappropriate for list, and > undecided (give to someone else). "inappropriate for list" is a dangerous power to give to random volunteers. I think this is out of scope for a discussion of spam prevention. Otherwise, I have no particular objections, though the obvious obstacle is the actual implementation. Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
pgpOfRIekKh3G.pgp
Description: PGP signature