On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 05:17:07PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: > Earlier today I enabled SpamAssassin filtering for all mail sent to the BTS. > Procmail and SpamAssassin have recently been installed into owner@bugs mail, > were we have monitored their progress and hit rate. It might be a good idea to update to SA 2.43 Some of the rules have been greatly improved since 2.20. As an example, here it goes a comparison of the same mail through 2.20 and 2.43, using spamd/spamc: [I will just show the relevant parts: MessageID and SA status lines] Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 07:39:50 -0400 Message-ID: <9BDB037E1414264C91C3E6286C236BE8DF215F@HQ-MAIL1.ptcnet.ptc.com> [2.20] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.8 required=5.0 tests=NO_MX_FOR_FROM version=2.20 X-Spam-Level: * [2.43] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_03_05, X_LOOP,X_MAILING_LIST version=2.43 X-Spam-Level: -- Jesus Climent | Unix System Admin | Helsinki, Finland. web: www.hispalinux.es/~data/ | pumuki.hispalinux.es ------------------------------------------------------ Please, encrypt mail sent to me: GnuPG ID: 86946D69 FP: BB64 2339 1CAA 7064 E429 7E18 66FC 1D7F 8694 6D69 ------------------------------------------------------ Registered Linux user #66350 Debian 3.0 & Linux 2.4.20 It's a soldier's duty. You wouldn't understand. --The Colonel (Akira)
Attachment:
pgp9k9HynKoKF.pgp
Description: PGP signature