On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 05:17:07PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> Earlier today I enabled SpamAssassin filtering for all mail sent to the BTS.
> Procmail and SpamAssassin have recently been installed into owner@bugs mail,
> were we have monitored their progress and hit rate.
It might be a good idea to update to SA 2.43
Some of the rules have been greatly improved since 2.20. As an example,
here it goes a comparison of the same mail through 2.20 and 2.43, using
spamd/spamc:
[I will just show the relevant parts: MessageID and SA status lines]
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 07:39:50 -0400
Message-ID: <9BDB037E1414264C91C3E6286C236BE8DF215F@HQ-MAIL1.ptcnet.ptc.com>
[2.20]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.8 required=5.0 tests=NO_MX_FOR_FROM version=2.20
X-Spam-Level: *
[2.43]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=5.0
tests=QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_03_05,
X_LOOP,X_MAILING_LIST
version=2.43
X-Spam-Level:
--
Jesus Climent | Unix System Admin | Helsinki, Finland.
web: www.hispalinux.es/~data/ | pumuki.hispalinux.es
------------------------------------------------------
Please, encrypt mail sent to me: GnuPG ID: 86946D69
FP: BB64 2339 1CAA 7064 E429 7E18 66FC 1D7F 8694 6D69
------------------------------------------------------
Registered Linux user #66350 Debian 3.0 & Linux 2.4.20
It's a soldier's duty. You wouldn't understand.
--The Colonel (Akira)
Attachment:
pgp9k9HynKoKF.pgp
Description: PGP signature