Re: Mutt-testing requires libgnutls-unstable?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Mutt-testing requires libgnutls-unstable?
From: Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 13:48:31 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20021017114831.GC1938@wonderland.linux.it>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] E1824eX-0001MZ-00@pc6953>
References: <[🔎] E1824eX-0001MZ-00@pc6953>

On Oct 17, Auke Jilderda <jilderda@dds.nl> wrote:

 >Hence, this suggests the Mutt version currently in testing needs a 
 >library currently in unstable.  Is this the way it is supposed to be?
Yes.

-- 
ciao,
Marco

Attachment: pgpcq5j8r0iYv.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mutt-testing requires libgnutls-unstable?
  - From: Graham Wilson <bob@decoy.wox.org>
- Re: Mutt-testing requires libgnutls-unstable?
  - From: Auke Jilderda <jilderda@dds.nl>

References:
- Mutt-testing requires libgnutls-unstable?
  - From: Auke Jilderda <jilderda@dds.nl>

Prev by Date: Re: Freetype
Next by Date: Re: SpamAssassin now used to filter BTS Mail
Previous by thread: Mutt-testing requires libgnutls-unstable?
Next by thread: Re: Mutt-testing requires libgnutls-unstable?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread