Re: New control field proposal which could help on gcc3.2 transition
On Sun, Sep 15, 2002 at 07:20:25PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > * Joey Hess
> > | That's a bit broken or does cdebconf support cached seen flags in a
> > | single session now?
> > I'm not sure what you mean by cached seen flags, but according to
> > tausq and you it would be sane to upload, it just wouldn't make any
> > sense until packages were updated to depend on debconf-2.0
> #160776 (would someone like to second it)
Is there a reason to not allow translations of default fields of a select
or multiselect type question? Is there a reason to have an explicit list
of fields suitable for l10n?