[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: New control field proposal which could help on gcc3.2 transition



On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 12:05:39PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Genralize it past library packages and this isn't really much of an
> option though. Something like debconf FE can break backwards
> compatability and yet has no soname, unfortunatly.

So why don't we give it a "soname" ? "Depends: debconf-1 (>= 1.0.24)", eg?

Cheers,
aj

-- 
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

 ``If you don't do it now, you'll be one year older when you do.''

Attachment: pgp_LwEUkO5CJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: