On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 12:05:39PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Genralize it past library packages and this isn't really much of an > option though. Something like debconf FE can break backwards > compatability and yet has no soname, unfortunatly. So why don't we give it a "soname" ? "Depends: debconf-1 (>= 1.0.24)", eg? Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <email@example.com> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``If you don't do it now, you'll be one year older when you do.''
Description: PGP signature