[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: New control field proposal which could help on gcc3.2 transition

Joey Hess wrote:
> Anthony Towns wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 12:05:39PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > Genralize it past library packages and this isn't really much of an
> > > option though. Something like debconf FE can break backwards
> > > compatability and yet has no soname, unfortunatly.
> > 
> > So why don't we give it a "soname" ? "Depends: debconf-1 (>= 1.0.24)", eg?
> We're going to do just that once we rework debconf policy a bit. It will
> start at debconf-2 though. 

Er, I'm not renaming debconf though, it will be a provides that is
provided by both debconf and eventually cdebconf.

see shy jo

Attachment: pgp_Z4g9nmqHg.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: