Re: Bug#160284: ITP: po-debconf -- Manage translated Debconf templates files with gettext
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 05:55:39PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 12:19:55PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > Yes well, it's a pity that nobody is honoring the reply-to I set..
> > Perhaps the other header didn't help. :)
> Pity mutt adds that when a mail is set and doesn't seem to let it be
You can add your own header by that name and mutt won't override it, I
> Anyway, reply-to should probably trounce mail-followup-to.
It probably can't. If you have the different operations of "reply to
individual" and "reply to list", and Mail-Followup-To: takes the "reply
to list" role, then Reply-To: has to fulfil the function of specifying a
reply address for the individual. Otherwise people who can't change
their From: line for one reason or another can't say that they'd like
private replies to go elsewhere.
IIRC somebody (DJB?) proposed Mail-Reply-To: in addition to
Mail-Followup-To: to resolve this overloading problem.
Colin Watson [email@example.com]