Re: binutils-dev dependency problem...
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 01:10:59PM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> Maybe it should be in /usr/lib/binutils/ then?
Actually, it simply shouldn't include a libbfd.so link.
Why was this changed?
The changelog only says:
* Put the symlinks libbfd.so and libopcode.so into binutils-dev, so one
can link to them.
This makes no sense; one should _not_ link to them, except statically
(which requires libbfd.a) or from the binutils package itself (which
doesn't use binutils-dev).