[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Improper NMU (Re: NMU for libquota-perl)

On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 09:32:42AM +0000, Martin Wheeler wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Sebastian Rittau wrote:
> >  If you're not able to maintain
> > your packages properly and in a timely manner, and your holding up a
> > major part of the distribution, it's your fault.
> I'm interested in this.
> Individuals differ greatly in their working methods.
> So what is considered: "in a timely manner"?  (Seriously.)

"Before somebody else is sufficiently motivated to do it".

I see no point in holding it against somebody if they don't fix it
first - as long as either somebody fixes it, or nobody cares, why does
it matter?

  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ | Dept. of Computing,
 `. `'                          | Imperial College,
   `-             -><-          | London, UK

Attachment: pgpToe2Y3rEZZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: