Re: Non-Intel package uploads by maintainer
John Goerzen <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 09:51:32PM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> > Imagine for eample the case where the sources are missing files, as
> > happens too often. Then the binary is in violation of the GPL.
> > Not good. So why not let the autobuilder do their job for all archs.
> Because then there's no opportunity to test what was built prior to
> uploading it to the archive. If you do a standard upload, you'll at least
> have the opportunity to test the actual .debs produced on one architecture.
> -- John
You should do that anyway. Testing and uploading should be seperate
PS: you should also test the result of the autobuilder.