On Sun, Aug 04, 2002 at 09:36:07PM +0200, Frank Lenaerts wrote: > > (1) developer perspective: having the finest possible granularity is > best for maintenance purposes > > (2) user perspective: ease of selecting things: it might indeed be > more difficult to select some little apps from a large list, but > with things like the task packages, meta packages bundling > together things to ease selection, this should not be a problem > anymore > > To conclude, I would choose to have things packaged separately and > have other packages to group packages that are often used together. Like a meta package? Just create "dockapps-net" which depends on all the net-related packages. Or separated for popularity as dockapp-popular or whatever. J -- Jesus Climent | Unix System Admin | Helsinki, Finland. http://www.HispaLinux.es/~data/ | data.pandacrew.org ------------------------------------------------------ Please, encrypt mail address to me: GnuPG ID: 86946D69 FP: BB64 2339 1CAA 7064 E429 7E18 66FC 1D7F 8694 6D69 ------------------------------------------------------ Registered Linux user #66350 Debian 3.0 & Linux 2.4.19 It's called a change-over. The movie goes on and nobody knows the difference. --Narrator (Fight club)
Attachment:
pgpV65hUqLQq9.pgp
Description: PGP signature