Re: Accepted sdl-image1.2 1.2.2-1 (i386 source)
Steve Langasek <email@example.com> immo vero scripsit:
> Sorry, looking at the package, I thought I saw that sdl was still
> compiled against libpng2. If the package is already compiled against
> libpng3, it's not necessary to go to extra work to roll it back; just
> recompile against version-enabled libpng3. All packages that currently
> use sdl-image and libpng2 will still be broken -- this is nothing new --
> but now they can choose between porting to libpng3, or just recompiling
> against libpng2.
So where is that version-enabled libpng3?
firstname.lastname@example.org : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org