Re: Accepted sdl-image1.2 1.2.2-1 (i386 source)
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 08:08:13AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> cts@debian.org (Christian T. Steigies) immo vero scripsit:
> > * new upstream version (closes: #150670)
> > * build-depend on new SDL 1.2.4
> > * patch acinclude.m4, configure.in
> > * re-run libtoolize --force --copy; aclocal; patch aclocal.m4 to include
> > SDL_LIBS_FOR_LIBS, then run automake --foreign; autoconf
> > * depend on libpng-dev, not on (older) libpng2-dev (closes: #152302)
> > Files:
>
> Do you realize that it is bad idea to rebuild against libpng3
> without changing the soname of your package?
No I didn't, what do you propose?
If a package keeps the same SONAME, it means that the BINARY COMPATIBILITY
IS KEPT.
I did not see any incompatibility (yet), are you sure it is necessary?
But I guess I'll have to revert to png2 and reopen he bug. Changing the
soname would require an sdl-image1.2debian package?
If anybody who knows more about libraries than me is interested in
maintaining sdl-image and sdl-mixer, I'd like to hear from you.
Christian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: