[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Accepted sdl-image1.2 1.2.2-1 (i386 source)

On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 08:08:13AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> cts@debian.org (Christian T. Steigies) immo vero scripsit:
> >    * new upstream version (closes: #150670)
> >    * build-depend on new SDL 1.2.4
> >    * patch acinclude.m4, configure.in
> >    * re-run libtoolize --force --copy; aclocal; patch aclocal.m4 to include
> >      SDL_LIBS_FOR_LIBS, then run automake --foreign; autoconf
> >    * depend on libpng-dev, not on (older) libpng2-dev (closes: #152302)
> > Files: 
> Do you realize that it is bad idea to rebuild against libpng3 
> without changing the soname of your package?

No I didn't, what do you propose?

  If a package keeps the same SONAME, it means that the BINARY COMPATIBILITY

I did not see any incompatibility (yet), are you sure it is necessary?
But I guess I'll have to revert to png2 and reopen he bug. Changing the
soname would require an sdl-image1.2debian package?

If anybody who knows more about libraries than me is interested in
maintaining sdl-image and sdl-mixer, I'd like to hear from you.


To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to: