base-files and /dev
Does base-files really need to own /dev? If so why?
In my SE Linux security policy I am only allowing devfsd to change the
context of all /dev on a devfs system. Upgrading base-files causes dpkg to
try and relabel /dev as it's apparently owned by base-files.
I do not get viruses because I do not use MS software.
If you use Outlook then please do not put my email address in your
address-book so that WHEN you get a virus it won't use my address in the
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org