Re: base-files and /dev
Russell Coker wrote:
> Does base-files really need to own /dev? If so why?
> In my SE Linux security policy I am only allowing devfsd to change the
> context of all /dev on a devfs system. Upgrading base-files causes dpkg to
> try and relabel /dev as it's apparently owned by base-files.
Seems like a misfeature that we should better fix rather than hide it
by removing /dev from base-files.
In either case, I believe APT has hooks that allow you to do certain
things before an upgrade and other things after the upgrade. Perhaps
you could use them to work around this problem.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org