On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 04:04:38AM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > how should an DD handle upstream bug reporting scripts (e.g. pre configured > Gnats clients)? ircii for example ships a "ircbug" program for that purpose. > I left it out, cause I expected the debian user to use the debian bug > reporting. This has the advantage, that the ircii author is not bothered > with upstream bugs. In case of ircii the work with the upstream author works > pretty well, he even reads debian bugs himself and sends me hints on how to > close them. You're fortunate, more than one upstream I've dealt with HATES the Debian BTS and its silly email-only control mechanism, lack of authentication, lack of attachment handling, and inclusion of email addresses unfrobbed on web pages, and its over-verbosity when it comes to all of the mail headers and suchlike. These people then praise bugzilla and I feel the need to be suddenly ill given that the thing just about requires javascript to be sane, and has basically no email-based manipulation of the bug system at all. Guess you just can't win either way. =p -- Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@bluecherry.net> If this sig were funny... <Epsilon3> Knghtbrd, if we wanted a lameass remark we would have said: Hey, neckro
Attachment:
pgpcAbXNla4qL.pgp
Description: PGP signature