Re: RFC init.d actions [force-]reload and non-running programs
Previously Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> Personally I think it is much better the way it is done yet. force-reload
> and restart simply start the daemon if it was not running. That avoids
> having a lot of bugs and is the logical action one expects in most cases.
But it is also not what policy says (which can be changed), or what the
name of the option implies (which can't be changed).
/email@example.com This space intentionally left occupied \
| firstname.lastname@example.org http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org