Re: RFC init.d actions [force-]reload and non-running programs
Previously Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> So the right thing to do is to not start it but to report an exit code?
I'ld say so. You can use the --test option from start-stop-daemon to
> which one?
Policy doesn't say, feel free to suggest one.
> shoule we file bug reports against all init.d scripts?
That would be mass filing bugreports. Before you do that try and
get a consensus on debain-devel that that would be a good thing
(I think it would) and create some example init.d scripts that
implement this correctly.
/firstname.lastname@example.org This space intentionally left occupied \
| email@example.com http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com