[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Paper on init scripts and Debian (debconf2)

On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 09:27:26AM +0000, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> >Why not use a virtual package (initscripts or so) on which an essential
> >package (like sysvinit) depends? That way you can easily replace the
> >initscripts.
> Ah, so
> sysvinit-bin Depends: initscripts-base
> initscripts-sysvinit: Provides: initscripts-base
> initscripts-bsd: Provides: initscripts-base

Why've you got sysvinit renamed to sysvinit-bin? Essential packages should
Pre-Depend: rather than Depend: on packages they need in almost all cases.

> What was the official procedure again to register virtual packages?

File a bug on debian-policy?


Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

 ``If you don't do it now, you'll be one year older when you do.''

Attachment: pgpknn1kahxJb.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: