Re: Unparsable gcc version string? [WAS: lily 1.4.15]
Wichert Akkerman <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Previously Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>> I think maybe someone should file a bug to the Debian gcc package.
>> LilyPond will not be the only package to verify the version of the
> Why would you want to anyway?
Because it works and is a lot easier than to devise all sorts of tests
for all kinds of tools to
> Check for specific [compiler] features using proper autoconf tests
The compiler is 'just one' of the tools that can be outdated.
I don't think anyone is served better by unparsable version strings,
that incidentally, also break the GNU coding standards.
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <email@example.com> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com