[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposal for fixing automake (was Re: State of automake packages)

Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@bluecherry.net> immo vero scripsit:

> If three more people step up to do this, and one or two people step up to
> do all the autobuilding, we can make short work of the entire contents of
> sid, I suspect.  And given authority to generally abuse power and NMU
> packages with purely the auto* fixes if the maintainer doesn't do so in a
> reasonable timeframe, I suspect it won't be too hard.

I have a very large backlog of build failures listed in
BTS already, which I myself cannot really process within a 
reasonable timeframe.

I don't think it's feasible to get something like that done.

I think we already have some unfixed build failures caused by
the new libtool.


dancer@debian.org : Junichi Uekawa   http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423  7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/

To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to: