Re: LVM 1:1.0.4 - Don't upgrade.
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 02:14:15PM +0000, Jason Lunz wrote:
> firstname.lastname@example.org said:
> > Previously Patrick Caulfield wrote:
> >> My motives for going from 1.1 back to 1.0.4 were twofold and I still beleive
> >> they are right:
> > - Sistina themselves say 1.1 should never have happened and highly
> > recommend people to switch to 1.0.4.
> So should 1.1rc1 still be in testing? Is this the sort of thing for
> which exceptions to the freeze are made?
Personally I don't think LVM 1.1 should be still on the planet :)
I would love to see 1.0.4 in testing/woody (after a few people have done a
successful upgrade of course).
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org