Re: User-Centered Release Goal Proposal for woody+1
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 06:08:27PM +0200, Michael Piefel <piefel@debian.org> was heard to say:
> Am 29.05.02 um 12:17:04 schrieb Ben Armstrong:
> > > - woody + gcc 3.1
> > I'm not arguing this is a bad thing, but is this "no major restructuring
> > required"? And is this "user-centred"?
>
> Hmm, depends on what you are using. For me as a software developer,
> availability of g++ 3.1 is important.
g++ 3.1 is already in unstable, actually :)
I'd like to have one compiler on all architectures, personally, but I
would be willing to put up with another "different compilers everywhere"
release if it meant we could release again soon.
Daniel
--
/-------------------- Daniel Burrows <dburrows@debian.org> -------------------\
| swapon /dev/ram |
\-Evil Overlord, Inc: planning your future today. http://www.eviloverlord.com-/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: