Re: User-Centered Release Goal Proposal for woody+1
Am 29.05.02 um 12:17:04 schrieb Ben Armstrong:
> > - woody + gcc 3.1
> I'm not arguing this is a bad thing, but is this "no major restructuring
> required"? And is this "user-centred"?
Hmm, depends on what you are using. For me as a software developer,
availability of g++ 3.1 is important.
Having gcc3.1 as standard compiler which is used for all binaries and
libraries is something different, and I didn't mean that. That would
indeed not be a user-issue.
Bye,
Mike
--
|=| Michael Piefel
|=| Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
|=| Tel. (+49 30) 2093 3831
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: